• CONSORTIUM
• MEMBERS
• PARTNERS
• PUBLICATIONS
• GRANT SUPPORT
• LINKS

The Consortium

Background of the Solar Bio-Fuels Consortium

Green algae and advanced bioreactor systems have significant practical and economic advantages for bio-fuel production over traditional crop plants. To facilitate the efficient development of algal bio-fuels processes, such as the production of bio-hydrogen, bio-diesel, biomass for BTL and biomass for bio-methane, Ben Hankamer and Olaf Kruse established the Solar Bio-Fuels Consortium through the commercialisation wing of the Institute for Molecular Bioscience (IMB) - UniQuest. This consortium now includes 8 groups: Ben Hankamer (The University of Queensland), Olaf Kruse (Universität Bielefeld, Germany), Clemens Posten (Universität Karlsruhe, Germany), Tony Larkum (The University of Sydney), Ute Marx (The University of Queensland), Michael Hippler (Universität Münster), Tony Larkum (The University of Sydney), Peter Nixon (Imperial College London) and Christian Wilhelm (University of Leipzig), and continued expansion is planned. Collectively, we conduct bio-discovery, structural biology, molecular biology, microbiology, genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabonomics, culture optimisation and bioreactor scale-up within a coordinated research program. The consortium therefore provides an extensive set of skills and facilities and a single point of contact for industry as well as a network of international links.

Reference:
M. Hoffert, K. Caldeira, A. Jain, E. Haites, L. Harvey, S. Potter, M. Schlesinger, S. Schneider, R. Watts, T. Wigley, D. Wuebbles, Energy implications of future stabilisation of atmospheric CO₂ content, NATURE, 1998, 395, 881-884.

In higher plants and green algae, light is captured by specialised Light Harvesting Complex proteins, referred to here as LHCI and LHCII, (Fig.1) which confer the ability to adapt to changing light levels. The excitation energy is then funnelled to the photosynthetic reaction centres of photosystem I (PSI) and photosystem II (PSII). PSII uses this energy to drive the photosynthetic water splitting reaction, which converts water into protons, electrons and oxygen. The electrons are passed along the photosynthetic electron transport chain (Fig.1, thin solid black arrows) via plastoquinone (PQ), cytochrome b₆f (Cyt b₆f), photosystem I (PSI), and ferredoxin (Fd) and on to NADPH. Simultaneously, protons are released into the thylakoid lumen by PSII and the PQ/PQH₂ cycle (Fig.1; proton flow indicated by thin black dashed arrows). This generates a proton gradient, which drives ATP production via ATP synthase. The protons and electrons are recombined by ferredoxin-NADP⁺ oxidoreductase (FNR) to produce NADPH. NADPH and ATP are used in the Calvin cycle and other biochemical pathways to produce the sugars, starch, oils and other bio-molecules (which collectively form biomass) that are required to produce bio-ethanol, bio-diesel, bio-methane- and BTL-based bio-fuels. Alternatively in some photosynthetic micro-organisms like the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii the protons and electrons extracted from water (or starch) can be fed to the hydrogenase (HydA) via the electron transport chain to drive the direct production of bio-H₂ (Fig.1).

Figure 1: The central role of photosynthesis in bio-fuel production.

 Advantages of Algal Bioreactors

Economic Viability: The potential of solar bio-fuel production is highlighted by the fact that even using current technology, Brazilian sugar-cane-based and US corn-based bio-ethanol production are cost competitive at oil prices of US $40 and US $60 per barrel, while the equivalent for biodiesel is US $80 (The Economist, 2006). Thus, even modest increases in photosynthetic efficiency are expected to yield significant increases in economic competitiveness. Algae have various advantages over classical crop plants for the production of biofuels and can be engineered to increase photosynthetic effciency.

Reducing arable land use for bio-fuel production: A common concern related to bio-fuels is that as their production capacities increase, so will the competition with agriculture for arable land. Similarly rainforest regions are being cleared to make room for the palm plantations required for the production of oil for bio-fuels. In contrast algal bioreactors are designed to be sited on non-arable land, eliminating this competition and opening up new economic opportunities for arid regions.

Short life cycles increase yield: In contrast to conventional crop plants, which yield a harvest once or twice a year, the micro-algae have a life cycle (~1-10 days depending on the process), with the result that multiple or continuous harvests with increased yield are be produced.

Reducing H₂O use in agriculture: Conventional crops used for bio-fuel production require substantial amounts of fresh water. Due to the increased photosynthetic efficiency of engineered algae and the use of closed bioreactors, considerable savings in net water use can be achieved.

Coupling clean fuel production to desalination: Marine and salt tolerant algae can extract hydrogen (as protons and electrons) and oxygen from water. Upon combustion of hydrogen and oxygen fresh water is produced. Consequently by using stationary fuel cells that use hydrogen and oxygen to feed electricity into the national grid, energy generation can be coupled with desalination.

Environmentally sensitive waste disposal: The algal biomass generated in algal bioreactors can be gasified to produce a range of bio-fuels. The CO₂ released during gasification is no more than that previously absorbed, making this type of process CO₂ neutral. In this way biological GMO waste can also be effectively disposed of in an environmentally sensitive way.

Reference:
Bakersfield, California and Calgary, Alberta, The oil industry: Steady as she goes, Why the world is not about to run out of oil, The Economist, 2006, London, p.65-67.

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was set up jointly by the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Programme to provide an authoritative international statement of scientific understanding of climate change. The IPCC?s periodic assessments of the causes, impacts and possible response strategies to climate change are the most comprehensive and up-to-date reports available on the subject, and form the standard reference for all concerned with climate change in academia, government and industry worldwide. Through three working groups, many hundreds of international experts assess climate change in this Fourth Assessment Report."

This report can be obtained from http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml#.T59ADtmseAo

An 18 page summary for policy makers can be obtained from http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/AR4WG1_Print_SPM.pdf.

The importance of the IPCC work for the Solar Bio-fuels Consortium, is that it highlights the environmental importance for the development of clean fuels for the future. However it took the Stern report (2006) to convincingly demonstrate that acting to combat climate change not only makes environmental but also economic sense.

The predicted effect of climate change include melting of the polar ice caps (by ~2100), sea level rises, disruption of ocean currents (e.g. Gulf Stream), extreme weather patterns (e.g. droughts, flooding and hurricanes) and large scale species extinction. Figure 2 shows an adaptation of the data presented in the Stern review, with the effects predicted to occur at atmospheric CO₂ levels of 450 ppm and 550 ppm CO₂ being highlighted. These suggest that it would be far safer to stabilise at 450 ppm than 550 ppm. Many scientists however think that unless very strong environmental policies are put in place quickly, we will only be able to stabilise at the 550 ppm level.

The importance of the Stern review lies in the fact that it defines the scale of the climate change problem, presents a path of action to prevent the worst of these effects and helps to establish a timetable within which to do so. Stern states "Taking strong action to reduce emissions - must be viewed as an investment [~1% GDP vs. 20% loss of GDP for inaction], a cost incurred now and in the coming few decades to avoid the risks of very severe consequences in the future." "This investment" [represents] "the pro-growth strategy for the longer term" and should enable a "policy to support innovation and deployment of low carbon technologies".

Figure 2: Adapted from Figure 2 of the Stern report-Executive summary.